Posted on 08/02/2009 1:35:53 AM PDT by rxsid
Edited on 08/06/2009 12:10:02 AM PDT by John Robinson. [history]
I don't know if that's smart. It's like asking the fox in the hen house don't eat the hens.
Delusions of grandure. I don’t see it debunked nor do I see it authendicated. I will wait to see what happens, as I see it everything they do UNRAVELS. I believe it is a sign of the times.
Madoff, Dr Fukuda swineflu director at the WHO... who knows whatever is going to come to light but I do believe it will.
She may have needed the birth registration for the divorce, but they would probably also have needed it for Sotero to adopt him.
Most of his “thugs” are just lazy moochers who would scatter as soon as the going got rough. They were good at scaring old ladies at caucuses but face down the military? Doesn’t sound like their bag to me.
Seems to be certified in 64. Mine is similar in that I got a copy when I was 15 and it was certified on THAT date.
You too!
I’d say that’s when someone asked for this copy
How do you know that. Could have been a retread.
That DOES stink out loud.
Now that would be much better history than watching our country being destroyed from within.
I’m mostly troubled by the 47,044 number at the top of the document
47 years old=Obama’s age
0=stands for Obama?
44= 44th president
Seems to telegraph hoax
Concerns:
47044 = 47-0-44 = 47 (age of President), O(bama), 44th President.
“Here’s the smoking gun, we got him”:
Oduya = Oh dou you?
Signed 17th February 1964:
Congressional Record, February 17, 1964
The Congressional Record documents the legislative debate and action in Congress. In this speech on the Senate floor, Dirksen talks about the pressure to act on civil rights. [Everett M. Dirksen Papers. Working Papers, f. 253. The Dirksen Congressional Center, Pekin, IL]
(For a transcript of this document, click here.)
Kind of timely with Gates, eh?
I hope you’re right, but i’m just sayin’...
It was registered before the date it was printed, and if it was in the hospital it says it was, then the hospital would have been part of that registration process. Sr. might have just wanted a Document that stated he had a son born in the REPUBLIC of KENYA which was something greatly celebrated by the proud people there I would imagine! It’s not every year that happens, and heck why not mark both things with an official document saying “Republic of Kenya.”
Heck if I know, its all speculation.
Just following back and forth on the posts that are talking about it, I got the idea that the seal or something else had that date stamped on it. As if that was the date the copy was made? I dunno..this thread has been moving so fast it is hard to keep up.
What about the two different Registrars listed? E.F. Lavender and Mr. Miller??
Yes they would have, if they wanted to make sure he got a long form BC from Hawaii, and stating he was born in a certain hospital. There has already been two newspapers that were supposed to have announced his birth in 1961 in Hawaii, from a particular hospital. That was a thread you must have missed, last week.
OReilly Factor claims they have seen the BC??? And that the Hawaii officials are claiming a Hawaii birth. That would have taken a doctor from Hawaii’s signature at time of the birth, for Hawaii to be standing by the one they have.
I don’t agree, but I have always said “until a true authenticated copy of the Kenya BC surfaces”, this whole thing is going nowhere with the courts.
>is it possible that Rahm did not already provide the price you refer to for these particular hospital records?
You want to make a bet?<
OH HELL NO!
Pass on the bet thank you
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.