I haven’t seen any wide discrepancies in delegate count, just the ORDER in which the primaries take place. Why should Iowa be first? The answer to that question in my proposal would be: because they had the highest r voting percentage. The current answer is some convoluted appeal to tradition and some other baloney that never makes sense.
a state that has more republicans already gets rewarded with more delegates.
there is no need for them to go first also.
furthermore, trying to rig the game fails, in the end the strongest candidate will always emerge and in 96, that was dole, in 2000, it wa bush and in 2008, it was McCain.