[Leonard210]

Conclusion of the author of Common DNA Sequences: Evidence of Evolution or Efficient Design?:

"The genetic picture that is beginning to emerge is one of incredible networked and regulatory complexity combined with an extremely high level of efficiency in code usage--certainly nothing that could have evolved on its own through chance random evolutionary processes. As is easily seen, trying to use common genes related to common processes as proof of evolution quickly falls apart in light of the bigger genomic picture. In fact, it really speaks of smart coding by the ultimate bio-systems programmer--God Himself."

Why not respond to the article and its conclusion?

[org.whodat]

What does the underwater basket weaver have a degree in?? What not responding to the question?

[tpanther]

It’s the same ole same ole...GGG posts articles, scientific articles and the libs come on and start making these comments, whine about not seeing the science normal people plainly see, then project-alot, then whine and cry when their behavior is exposed and then laughably THEY call for more civility!

Literally, anything it takes to protect their cult by moving away fom the article’s observations, scientific details and so on...ad-infinatum. As long as there’s their incessant sniping and so on, they don’t have to engage in the dismantling of their cult.

It’s never ever been about the science, it’s ALWAYS been about their ideology and tight control of the gubmint run NEA liberal secualr humanist science curricula.