[Nathan Zachary]

"“God decided that he was incapable of forgiving us without a blood sacrifice. So, to protect us from himself, he sent the human version of himself to appease himself by sacrificing himself to himself to save us from himself.”

How would you counter the above inference?

Absolute rubbish written by someone who hasn't a clue what the purpose of Christ's coming was, and even a basic understanding of scripture itself.

[MyTwoCopperCoins]

Without the melodramatics, doesn’t the whole thing reduce to that, in essence? Yes, or no?