Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim Robinson

Yes, at this point, the only proof of is birth is a “certificate of live birth” from Hawaii which would not be sufficient to qualify you for a US passport. If it’s not enough to qualify a person for a US passport, it certainly should not be sufficient proof of one’s qualifications to be POTUS.


9 posted on 07/30/2009 11:58:28 PM PDT by Tamar1973 (http://koreanforniancooking.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tamar1973
the only proof of is birth is a “certificate of live birth” from Hawaii which would not be sufficient to qualify you for a US passport

Ummm, actually it is. My niece was born in Indonesia in 1976 when my BIL was working for Hughes. She has a long form Indonesian BC. When her parents came back to the US in 1977, she was issued a COLB and a passport.

Now, 32 years later, she just got another passport and she only provided her COLB and that old passport. The COLB doesn't even list her parents but she recieved her brand new passport in record time just a few weeks ago.

88 posted on 07/31/2009 12:56:56 AM PDT by CAluvdubya (Palin 2012...YOU BETCHA!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

.

1.Obama delivered not one, but three different COLBs as proof of “natural born citizen” status. The one most commonly referred to by the press is attached. It is clearly a forgery.

2.Also attached is a “real” Hawaiian COLB issued to two twin girls born at one of the “two” hospitals Obama claims to have been born at. Their birth was less than 24 hours after Obama’s alleged birth. You will see that the real COLB looks nothing like the COLB produced by the Obama camp.

3.I have also attached an excerpt of Hawaiian law regarding the rules for issuing a COLB, which does NOT require that a child be born in Hawaii, or even born to US citizens, in order to receive a COLB, which explains how a foreign father could get a Hawaiian COLB for his son. Read it carefully.

4.If you research the Founders remarks regarding their “natural born citizen” clause, Article II - Section I of the US Constitution, you will learn that is doesn’t really matter where Barack Hussein Obama II was born, but rather where his father, Barack Hussein Obama I was a legal citizen at the time of the birth. The “dual citizenship” - “divided loyalty” clause, “natural law” was written into the Constitution for exactly the situation Barack Obama II represents. As the son of a British subject and citizen of Africa, Obama II would by “birth right” - “natural law” automatically adopt the name and citizenship of his father, who was not a US Citizen. This means that Obama II would have the very “dual or divided” loyalties that the Founders attempted to keep out of the Oval Office by way of Article II - Section I. And in case there is any doubt about the dangers involved of ignoring that clause, we can now see first hand, the result of having a president with “divided loyalties” in his “global” agenda, at odds with American interests.
There are two different COLBs. One is a “certificate of live birth” used for Hawaiian born citizens. The other is a “certification of live birth” used for Hawaiian residents born outside of Hawaii. Which one does Obama have, the one referred to by Hawaii officials as “real.?”

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/13223

.


197 posted on 07/31/2009 5:32:07 AM PDT by patriot08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Tamar1973

It’s not even as official as that Tamar! It’s a “CertificATION of Live Birth”.


202 posted on 07/31/2009 5:38:26 AM PDT by autumnraine (You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson