[Clinging Bitterly]

Well ya know it could be his legal advisers have legitimate concerns about just how settled the law is on “natural born” status as applied to article II, and want to avoid opening a can of worms by challenging the cases in every possible way.

But no, I think there's something in his past that he is hiding. A very big lie or omission of some kind.

I read an excellent piece in National Review today that explains how almost all the known history of the Present Occupant comes from his autobiographies rather than folks who knew him. He said himself there are “composite characters” in those volumes, and other things he has written have been shown to be embellished or completely fabricated.

Keep pushing I say. On all fronts. It's no less or more than lefties did to Bush over Florida 2000 and Ohio 2004. Right up to Jan. 20, 2009 they were always there.

[HiTech RedNeck]

How do you change your freepname but not your freepdate?

[DaveTesla]

I was thinking about the same article.

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZmJhMzlmZWFhOTQ3YjUxMDE2YWY4ZDMzZjZlYTVmZmU=

[Canadian Outrage]

His real information would also probably make his book and ENTIRE LIE. I don’t care what any of the naysayers say, this issue is causing Obama some panic. The way the White House responds so mockingly to the question just shows they are attempting to down play it’s significance. CO