Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Goreknowshowtocheat

“Clearly, the framers did not want divided loyalties otherwise there was no need to exempt themselves.”

What do you mean, exempt themselves from the natural born clause? But there was a very good practical reason for doing so: if they had not, there would have been no president for the first 35 years of U.S. history.


942 posted on 08/01/2009 2:40:16 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 910 | View Replies ]


To: Tublecane

If the clause is so clearly meaningless as you demonstrate, (fence jumper children qualify) why bother exempting themselves.


947 posted on 08/01/2009 3:43:35 PM PDT by Goreknowshowtocheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 942 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson