Nor do we have a single copy of anything penned by him as editor of the Harvard Law Review (or whatever they call that student journal.) This is odd since every other editor has written something.
I understand we don't have his SAT or LSAT scores. Do you recall the absolute God-awful mud-slinging that came about as a result of GW's SAT scores? Obama has "said" what his were, but no one has insisted he provide them.
Remember the national crisis brought about over GW's National Guard records? Why, they had to be totally released, and they were examined down to the hour by hour level. Remember Dan Rather's contribution?
I guarantee you I had to produce an original birth certificate in order to get a security clearance when in the military. They would not have been satisfied with an abstract. And if they went to the street address I gave, and it was not the proper address, they would demand that discrepancy be cleared up.
Yet we don't hear anything about this do we?
All I can say is it is wrong.
I completely agree that GW was raked over the coals and all the media does is bow down to the 0. It's a good starting point when talking with those misguided fools that voted for him the first time.
There is nothing, as far as we know, after he became Editor/President of Harvard Law Review.
Barack Obama's Case Comment on Abortion for the Harvard Law Review - Orin Kerr, August 22, 2008
Obama's Case Note - Eugene Volokh, August 22, 2008
Obama's lost law review article - Politico (8/22/08)
... an unsigned - and previously unattributed - 1990 article ... was published a month before he became president [of the Harvard Law Review] ... Obama campaign swiftly confirmed Obama's authorship