Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tublecane

Incorrect. See Book 1, para 214, last sentence.

Hope this helps.


837 posted on 07/31/2009 3:41:50 PM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 834 | View Replies ]


To: Plummz

“Book 1, para 214, last sentence”:

“Finally, there are states, as, for instance, England, where the single circumstance of being born in the country naturalizes the children of a foreigner.”

Alright, when I said, “Vattel appears to say that the only people who qualify as subjects or citizens at all are those born to citizen parents,” what I meant is that the only people who can qualify as BORN citizens are the children of two citizens. And this confirms it. He calls children of the soil naturalized, which in our language means by virtue of some mechanism after birth.

We all know the 14th amendment names two types of citizens: 1) children born in the U.S. and under the jurisdiction thereof, and 2) naturalized citizens. If Vattel ever had any authority on the subject, it has been lost. We no longer use his language. Soil babies are not naturalized.


845 posted on 07/31/2009 3:55:46 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 837 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson