“[I] find no fault with the introductory clause [S 61 Bill], which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen.”
I realize that’s what the guy said, and it may be what he intended, but it’s not what the amendment says. And it’s not what SCOTUS has said since. If nothing else, he’s wrong about it being declamatory of what is written in the Constitution concerning children born of parents owing no foreign allegiances. That does not appear anywhere in the Constitution.
It appears you want to be spoon fed here and I’ve done more than my part on this.
Natural Born is not the same as native born but you seem to miss the distinction.