Replies

Polarik himself decided that I was pawning off a forgery because I forgot to send him copies with a different contrast. THATS HIS ONLY EXCUSE so far. He has not responded to a SINGLE one of the multiple emails, scans and pictures I have sent since then. I don’t care how many degrees ANYONE has, he is still human, and can make MISTAKES. He made one here. Thats HIS problem. He should have sent me a reminder before he popped off his mouth. Thats HIS responsibility not mine. I know where I was born when I got my damned wallet stolen, and when I had my MOTHER order my damned COLB so I could freakin get my damned ID built back again.

Some URLs for your review:

http://barackryphal.blogspot.com/2009/07/meet-ronald-jay-polland.html
http://www.scribd.com/doc/17882344/ZLiberiltrtoJudgeRobrenoreInjunction073009-73009 — entered into the record by Birfer-in-Chief Philip J. Berg. See page 6.
Houston, we (may) have a Polarik.....
Zabadabadoo — Hmm. 1947. About right for the CV.

Cyn, I don’t know if you are makle or female, so take your gender pick and take it for that. You are a Goddess.

It appears that I ahave been more honest about who I am than the man accusing me of forging a real document! I feel so much better now. Given that the guy is just blatantly ignoring me, and the fact that he is so utterly incorrect faced with someone who isn’t backing down to his bluster, he looks all the more like a guy who got in over his head!

Thank you! I know know for certain this guy is a whack-a-mole with illusions of grandeur. I had thought he was a forensic documents expert. Instead he is a photo buff who is familiar with scanners.

Never trust anyone on the internet.... I learn the lesson again! My bad!

This post explains why the Danae exhibit was shoved in Polarik's face and why the mysterious anomolies are being dangled for confusion at FR.

LorenC has used different names to log on at FR and attack Polarik. It's the Chicago way don'tchaknow, to threaten someone who has personal flaws, if they don't shut up and get out of the criminal enterptrise's way. But conspicuously absent were the refutations of Polarik's work on the forgeries posted at Factcheck, KOS, and fight the smears Obama website!

Earlier on Thusday, the thread posted to attack Polarik directly was pulled by the mods. But this little entry is not only allowed to remain up, but some of the defenders of the questionable exhibit are pointing to it, to the links aimed at smearing Polarik, and even bragging that this poster has scads of evidence on Polarik! Is there a clear enough pattern here that we are being played by ateam of dnc operatives?

Polarik is not the issue, the ofrgeries are the issue, and the mysterious exhibits which appear, with odd anomolies in them. And this same team of posters are echoing the refrain that Hawaiian officials are incompetent. Is there a pattern here? I think there is. It's your site. I rest my case and will step aside now. Let the team have their way at FR, smearing Polarik rather than addressing the work he did which speaks for itself, and making outrageous claims of their own credulity when the exhibts in use are very suspect.