Replies

Do we know for sure that some of the “accepted by” formulations were issued AFTER Danae’s COLB and not all of them before?

120 posted on 07/30/2009 10:39:20 PM PDT by SirJohnBarleycorn

check out this new thread
FactCheck COLB are forged

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2304902/posts

124 posted on 07/30/2009 10:41:44 PM PDT by rolling_stone (no more bailouts, the taxpayers are out of money!)

To: SirJohnBarleycorn

Do we know for sure that some of the “accepted by” formulations were issued AFTER Danae’s COLB and not all of them before?

You can check for yourself. There is really only one other example other than Barry's forgery that says "filed by". I thought it said 2007, but another look says it could be 2001. If it is, then Barry's is again the anomalous one. The language could have been changed after 2001, before the others which were at least 2002 or 03. It could be that "filed by" is the old language, while "accepted by" is the new.

Mind's getting fuzzy, need to look at it all tomorrow evening.

135 posted on 07/30/2009 10:52:34 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794