""This shows that there is no Constitutional issue or question. So, when there is no Constitutional issue at problem here with the Qualifications for office, why would the Supreme Court get involved? Which is why they didn’t get involved."
I'm sorry, but the "statement" you keep trotting out does no such thing. Politicians make "statements" all the time, most of which aren't worth the paper they're written on. The necessary missing piece is that the document in question be NOTARIZED, or that the official be placed under oath as to the validity of the information. Without either of those things, her statement does NOT constitute proof. And no court of law would accept such a statement.
I've said this to you repeatedly, and you choose to simply ignore the facts.
You said — I’ve said this to you repeatedly, and you choose to simply ignore the facts.
—
The problem here is that things don’t run on facts as you might see them and how you want to “string them together”. There is a thing such as “reality” in which everyone lives and that governs how things *work* — regardless of how you want to string together a certain group of facts you want to portray...
I posted this to another FReeper here, but it applies to what I’m saying here, too...
When anyone gets this issue in court, then they can get into all that with the lawyers on opposing sides and a judge will hear it and then decide. And that won’t be the end of it, because there will be an appeal. And that won’t be the end of it, because there will be another appeal and perhaps one more after that and then perhaps the Supreme Court. And then, everyone waits to see if the Supreme Court is going to *even* bother with the case in the first place, which they may not and then it’s *absolutely dead* and nowhere. But, it may take it up and then it’s another long period of time before a decision comes. And then it might not even be the decision that most here will like. And then again, it may be. And after all that, we will be electing the next President, because Obama is opening up his Presidential Library and is on to other things. That’s the way it will go — if — it ever gets into a court and goes anywhere — in the first place, which I seriously doubt.
BUT — the *other way* this is seen (outside of a court and legal arguments) is by way of the public, and what they see and what they go by is simple. The State of Hawaii has affirmed that Obama was born in Hawaii and that he is a natural-born American citizen.
So, there are your two ways and the American public has the statement of the State of Hawaii and there *are no court cases* going right now... and there you have it...
That’s the “reality” of it and when the State of Hawaii says that Obama was born in Hawaii and that he is a natural-born American citizen, that’s the reality that is going to govern the way the vast majority of the American people view this issue in their own minds.
And certainly, you can keep right on “stringing your facts” together in a fashion that portrays your thinking and I’m sure a lot of others will do so, likewise. But, it’s not going to change the reality of the situation.