I heard you the first time, and I still disagree.
What part are you arguing?
Do you disagree that if Obama was born in Hawaii to a U.S. citizen mother and a foreign father, he is a natural-born Citizen?
Or do you disagree that he is a citizen at all?
Or do you simply disagree that he was born in Hawaii?
It appeared to me that you were arguing against citizenship. Are you really arguing that a person that is a citizen by birth, and born in the country, is still not a “natural-born citizen”?