Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mnehring
Some specific isotopes are created specifically from this decay. They aren't isotopes found in nature outside this process.

The presumption, then, is that there were none of those isotopes at one point. How is that point in time determined?

Wouldn't the material have started decaying as it was formed? Unless it all formed at once, there would be no accurate way to determine the age, as some of the parent material would already have been decaying as other of the material would be forming.

65 posted on 07/30/2009 12:06:25 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: metmom
Wouldn't the material have started decaying as it was formed? Unless it all formed at once, there would be no accurate way to determine the age, as some of the parent material would already have been decaying as other of the material would be forming.

Yes, but your reasoning is backwards.

The radioactive material (all heavy matter in fact) came from a supernova at which point it started decaying.

The question you should be asking is what does that date, except for the supernova?

79 posted on 07/30/2009 2:15:52 PM PDT by LeGrande (I once heard a smart man say that you canÂ’t reason someone out of something that they didnÂ’t reaso)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson