Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Frantzie
They are using Alinksy tactics to try to discredit.

Were each and every one of the House Republicans using "Alinksy tactics" when not a singly one of them voted against a Resolution on the House Floor that stated that Obama was born in Hawaii?

21 posted on 07/28/2009 10:59:58 PM PDT by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at 100 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: trumandogz

They chickened out - so what else is new. Obama has not provided proof and it is a Constitutional issue. Keep accepting Alinsky tactics by O.


30 posted on 07/28/2009 11:06:33 PM PDT by Frantzie (Lou Dobbs - American Hero!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: trumandogz; Frantzie
Were each and every one of the House Republicans using "Alinksy tactics" when not a singly one of them voted against a Resolution on the House Floor that stated that Obama was born in Hawaii?

Strawman argument, which is typical of you.

It started out as a resolution that talked about Hawaii and its history and then Ambercrombie stuck a clause in there pertaining to Obama being a natural born citizen. Bachmann tried to object, but realistically, it was too late at that point in time.

At any rate, it's a non binding resolution and if Obama has committed any malfeasence pertaining to his birth documents it will nothing to mitigate or absolve him of those transgressions or make him elegible to still hold office.

43 posted on 07/28/2009 11:25:01 PM PDT by Cyropaedia ("Virtue cannot separate itself from reality without becoming a principal of evil...".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: trumandogz; Frantzie
They are using Alinksy tactics to try to discredit.

Whenever there is this much flak even if its coming from both sides of the aisle - there's something there. The real facts are: There have only been 2 Presidents in the history of our nation who sealed all of their records from public view -- Obama and Chester Arthur. Chester Arthur was later found to be ineligible to have held the office and he knew he wasn't eligible -- thus he covered up as much information as he could and in some cases destroyed records, unfortunately he didn't burn all of them. With Obama not only has he sealed the circumstances of his birth, he's also sealed a whole lot more that are usually tradition to release -- not just the birth certificate -- everything. You have to explain that.

IMO: The 'conservatives' (and I now use that term loosely) who are jumping on the bandwagon against 'birthers' are in political 'cover up our butts' mode. They had the opportunity to vet this man just like the lib media did and failed, miserably. They also had the opportunity to demand in Congress that he prove his qualifications before certifying the election and failed, miserably.

Not ONE of these now proven to be fake conservatives stood up and issued a protest after the electoral college. So now they're going to go down along with the Messiah and naturally they don't want this covered, they want it suppressed. No surprise to me.

92 posted on 07/29/2009 7:25:17 AM PDT by conservativegramma (Palin has my vote: whoever the media hates I love)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson