To: MHGinTN; binary; tc45a
It is most likely a sequence of health department form processing. Please see post 262 and 263.
If it was based upon when the form was received (i.e., accepted/filed) by the Registrar, then Obama's number should STILL be lower, NOT higher, than the twin's birth certificate numbers.
264 posted on
07/29/2009 10:04:00 AM PDT by
BP2
(I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
To: BP2
If it was based upon when the form was received (i.e., accepted/filed) by the Registrar, then Obama's number should STILL be lower, NOT higher, than the twin's birth certificate numbers. There could have been multiple people processing these forms at the Registers office. Some may have worked faster than others. There could be many legitimate reasons the dates and numbers don't match. I don't think the registers office put the forms in order based upon date and birth hour-they could probably have cared less. All they wanted was to get them registered.
I want more info before making a decision.
268 posted on
07/29/2009 10:22:06 AM PDT by
tc45a
To: BP2; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; MeekOneGOP; ...
If it was based upon when the form was received (i.e., accepted/filed) by the Registrar, then Obamas number should STILL be lower, NOT higher, than the twins birth certificate numbers. Ping to posts 262-264.
269 posted on
07/29/2009 10:36:16 AM PDT by
LucyT
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson