Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hawaii Health Department’s Fukino Now Constitutional Lawyer?
NaturalBornCitizen | July 28, 2009

Posted on 07/28/2009 11:09:59 AM PDT by ckilmer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: MamaTexan

The fact is, both Obama and McCain could have been born on the moon, and McCain would still be a natural-born citizen while Obama would not.

Even IF he was born in Hawaii [which I doubt] the best Zero could EVER be is a native-born citizen...and that’s just not good enough.

Not if you believe in the Constitution, anyway.
++++++++++++++++++++

Your last line may be the whole crux. There may be too many people in this nation who just don’t give a rip about the US Constitution, to make this appeal take force. That’s what bammy’s whole bank is on; that and the media lap dogs..


41 posted on 07/28/2009 1:40:35 PM PDT by SeattleBruce (God, Family, Church, Country & the Tea Party! Take America Back! (Objective media? Try BIGOTS.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MamaTexan

Very interesting information. The more I research into this, the more I find that Obama is NOT eligible to serve as President.

You wrote-
“CHAP. XIX. / Of Our Native Country, and Several Things That Relate to It / Law of Nations;
§ 212. Citizens and natives.
The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.


The United States may be the place of Zeros birth, BUT IT IS NOT HIS COUNTRY!”


42 posted on 07/28/2009 2:04:26 PM PDT by real_patriotic_american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj

Not only is the number sequence off, but look at the middle number, 1961. Isn’t the twins’ numbers 61 for the year? Also, notice a hyphen in BO’s. I don’t think that theirs has a hyphen.


43 posted on 07/28/2009 2:42:55 PM PDT by Jewels7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

BTTT


44 posted on 07/28/2009 3:31:57 PM PDT by antisocial (Texas SCV - Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jewels7
Not only is the number sequence off, but look at the middle number, 1961. Isn’t the twins’ numbers 61 for the year? Also, notice a hyphen in BO’s. I don’t think that theirs has a hyphen.

******

1. I wish that the twins, as an experiment, would request a copy of their birth certificates so that we could see if they were similar to the one that Obama displayed on his fight the smears site.

2. For instance, we could compare the number on the top of the twins' birth certificate with the one on Obama's short form birth certificate.

3. IMPORTANT: If the number atop the twins' short form birth certificates has ONLY two numbers---61---while the Obama short form birth certificate has FOUR numbers---1961---then we know that we have strong proof that someone tampered with Obama's short form birth certificate before it was displayed on the internet.

4. However, if the number atop the twins' short form birth certificates has only "1961" like Obama's short form birth certificate, then we have to look elsewhere to find out if Obama's short form birth certificate is fake or is not a fake.

45 posted on 07/28/2009 7:36:00 PM PDT by john mirse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: All; ckilmer

Clearing the Smoke on Obama’s Eligibility: An Intelligence Investigator’s June 10 Report

—snippet—

In 1961 if a 17 year old American girl gave birth in a foreign country to a child whose father was not an American citizen, that child had no right to any American citizenship, let alone the “natural born” citizenship that qualifies someone for the Presidency under Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution.

“ 7 FAM 1133.2-2 Original Provisions and Amendments to Section 301

(CT:CON-204; 11-01-2007)

“a. Section 301 as Effective on December 24, 1952: When enacted in 1952, section 301 required a U.S. citizen married to an alien to have been physically present in the United States for ten years, including five after reaching the age of fourteen, to transmit citizenship to foreign-born children. The ten-year transmission requirement remained in effect from 12:01 a.m. EDT December 24, 1952, through midnight November 13, 1986, and still is applicable to persons born during that period.

http://www.westernjournalism.com/?page_id=2697


46 posted on 07/28/2009 7:46:55 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet ("I won't invade the US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass." Admiral IsorokoYamamoto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the long march

If you look closely at the Hawaiian long form BCs in post 4 above you will see that the birthplace of the parents is one of the required entries.


47 posted on 07/28/2009 8:01:56 PM PDT by SFConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

Ping WOW-

Clearing the Smoke on Obama’s Eligibility: An Intelligence Investigator’s June 10 Report

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2303258/posts


48 posted on 07/28/2009 8:24:37 PM PDT by Texas Fossil (The last time I looked, this is still Texas where I live.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson