I can understand what you are saying, however, the words “trust me” from a government official of the USA with regard to this matter are FAIL, so much so that it is laughable. This is where I feel like someone is trying to convince me, but without actually offering any actual proof.
But furthermore, I don’t believe that there is any way that they can claim that he is a “natural-born citizen” even if they had viewed his actual long form bc, because if his parents are who he has said they are, then he is not, by any means, a natural born citizen.
You said — I can understand what you are saying, however, the words “trust me” from a government official of the USA with regard to this matter are FAIL, so much so that it is laughable. This is where I feel like someone is trying to convince me, but without actually offering any actual proof.
—
Well, even if some FReepers saw the document they would not believe it. Now..., I’m not making this up or “saying so” off the top of my head. I’m repeating what I’ve seen posted here, on Free Republic, already. It was clearly stated that there was *nothing* that could ever be shown, printed up, testified to, have an expert give an opinion on or *anything* that would ever get him to believe it.
Thus, it appears to be what Gibbs said, that there’s nothing that anyone could do to convince some of these people.
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
And lastly you said — But furthermore, I don’t believe that there is any way that they can claim that he is a “natural-born citizen” even if they had viewed his actual long form bc, because if his parents are who he has said they are, then he is not, by any means, a natural born citizen.
—
Well, the funny thing about that, is that you’ve got FReepers arguing on both sides of that one... LOL...
And if you can’t get FReepers to agree on it, then it’s obvious that it’s not such a settled matter as some say. So, I’m in the very doubtful category on that one....