Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WOSG
Rhodes completely undermines your contention as well, WOSG.
220 posted on 07/27/2009 10:09:54 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies ]


To: RegulatorCountry

No it doesnt. Rhodes was pre-14th amendment.

The key point about Rhodes is that it - like all the other court rulings - equates citizenship at birth with ‘natural-born’ citizenship. They are the same:
“all persons born in the allegiance of the United States are natural-born citizens.”

If Obama was born in the allegiance of the United States, ie was a citizen at birth, he’s a natural-born US citizen.


235 posted on 07/27/2009 12:05:03 PM PDT by WOSG (Why is Obama trying to bankrupt America with $16 trillion in spending over the next 4 years?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson