Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DaveLoneRanger
I think peer review is overblown in its use as an unassailable means of testing and approving, but it’s not worthless.

Is there some other method you think would be better?

Either you accept all published research, or none of it, or you view it all with a wary eye. Me, I view it with a wary eye. I believe things can be known in this universe, but I don’t accept the first thing that gets spit out by some PhD somewhere.

I don't see either accepting or rejecting all of it out of hand as being practical. If it's all being treated the same, then this research is just as questionable as the natural selection studies it says may be wrong.

51 posted on 07/23/2009 9:56:10 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson