Well, let me take a crack at it.
Why didn’t Hillary go after B.O. on this? Why didn’t McCain or Palin? I would feel much more comfortable with the legitimacy of these claims if one of them had taken up the mantle.
What has that got to do with anything?
Why is it that one of the top loons, Phil Berg - a Truther, mind you - is leading the charge on this?
What has that got to do with anything?
There is no group I despise more than the truthers who actually believe the US did 9-11 attacks and yet one of their ilk is leading this conspiracy hunt, too? Sorry, that doesn’t sit well with me.
What has that got to do with anything?
Hope that clears it up for you.
Sorry, it doesn’t clear it up for me at all. Hillary wanted the Presidency bad....Bill Clinton even more. If this info was true on B.O., they would have used it. They are absolutely RUTHLESS people, they would have used it. They didn’t...that tells me there is no there there.
McCain was what, 72, his last chance for the office, nothing to lose...he didn’t use it.
Phil Berg, a complete nutcase that we all despise for his views on 9-11 conspiracy being an inside job yet we’re supposed to ignore that and say how great he is when it comes to this conspiracy? Really? I mean....really really?
Come on.