To: Ethan Clive Osgoode
Why is this automatically assume to be a primate? It looks like a dinosaur fossil. Human ancestor, there needs to be a new word invented for that level of guessing. What a joke.
32 posted on
07/22/2009 4:55:48 AM PDT by
Jaime2099
(Human Evolution and the God of the Bible are not compatible)
To: Jaime2099
It looks remarkably like a mammal. Dinosaurs were not mammals.
See the nails?
35 posted on
07/22/2009 5:08:19 AM PDT by
muawiyah
To: Jaime2099
Why is this automatically assume to be a primate? It looks like a dinosaur fossil. Human ancestor, there needs to be a new word invented for that level of guessing. What a joke. You hit the nail on the head - that fossil could be a lizard, a dinosaur, a big rodent, or just about anything with 4 legs and a tail.
Yet, we're supposed to believe "scientists" (read: ivory tower-indoctrinated overedumacated trust-fund-babies) have some special ability to see more in that "fossil" than we FReepers do.
The sheer arrogance is astounding.
37 posted on
07/22/2009 7:08:57 AM PDT by
WondrousCreation
(Good science regarding the Earth's past only reveals what Christians have known for centuries!)
To: Jaime2099
It looks like a dinosaur fossil.Looks more like a dead monkey. Though it is hard to tell with it's skull all crushed like that.
42 posted on
07/22/2009 8:28:16 AM PDT by
UCANSEE2
(Where's this tagline thing everyone keeps talking about?)
To: Jaime2099
could it be an X-ray of Pelosi?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson