It starts on page 425, however, by end of life it seems to mean decisions, like nursing homes, in home care, living will etc.
The easiest thing to remember, that all of it is unconstitutional. What part of the Constitution does Congress think gives them this power? If it isn’t addressed, it is unconstitutional and illegal for them to do. They do lots of unconstitutional things, and we need to start really fighting back and striking it all down.
Could these congressmen willfully disregarding to Constitution, be considered treason? If not it should still be criminal, so they can be indicted and removed.
Do we really want them to be giving advice as to where the senior's money will go, or how soon, or the best way to die? In the end it is a money grab.
The mandatory is a given...the whole frickin' proposal is mandatory
Apologies for getting the page number wrong.
Not without a FAIR TRIAL. The procedure set forth in the Vigilante Mans Manual is to:
Seems rather straight forward to me. If you are absolutely sure they are guilty, the order of things can be reversed.
Surely not, I mean just because they vote to pass legislation, that hasn't even been written, let alone read. How could that be unconstitutional?