I'm just saying that the construct of "He must be a foreigner otherwise he would just give us the paper and put this to bed" is based on the flawed assumption that what he produced would be accepted as legitimate.
Taitz is not necessarily the standard bearer I'd like to see - the one thing that struck me as the most 'off' was her statement of victory the other day when the CA judge said the case would be decided on the merits - that hearing was pertaining to Taitz' motion for default against BHO, so a judge ruling that the "case would be decided on the merits" means that she lost the motion she was presenting to the court. Trying to turn a loss into a victory for the news cameras is not a confidence-inspiring move.
Taitz is not necessarily the standard bearer I’d like to see
__________________________
Dr. Taitz is about the ONLY standard bearer.
She is the ONLY one out there day after hitting Obama with everything possibly available.
Look for things to really get going since renouned attorney, Stephen Pidgeon, has been added as her assistant.
http://stephenpidgeon.com/
http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=2816
Dr. Orly may not win this one, but she will continue throwing enough sh*t against the wall that something is bound to stick- that is if the Obama machine doesn’t have her killed. She constantly receives death threats. I pray God keeps her- and Steve safe.
As for ‘bad lawyering’thing, sure she makes mistakes, but she’s GOT to be brilliant. How many of us could go to a foreign country, learn their language and become sucessful at a dental practice, real estate business and well as pass the state bar? Don’t sell this little lady short.
Something to think about.
.
Losing a motion for default is not unusual - most judges will look for any reason to allow the “defendant” their day in court.