Unbelievable that you extract one comment out of a string of conversation and make your absurd “One of the main problems I have with the “birthers” is that they do not police themselves AT ALL as far as truthful content but just pass it all on as if it were Gospel.”
Are you kidding me?
We all know the nature of blogging, from every political perspective—there are all variety of shades—that’s why an intelligent person reads the entire thread, considers the concrete stuff and draws their conclusions—or continues researching.
What a joke of a comment you post here.
Don't you think that reprinting such an easily verified LIE casts a shadow across every other “birther” pronouncement?
Neither is this a side issue, it is the main issue under discussion thus the title of the thread.
The big zero's birth announcement was published in the paper NOT when he was one year old, but only a week or so old, just as his contemporary birth announcements on that page were around a week old.
What a joke of a blog.