Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Marie
I cannot see any federal judge going against Jones V Bush.
20 posted on 07/16/2009 9:42:21 AM PDT by Perdogg (Sarah Palin-Jim DeMint 2012 - Liz Cheney for Sec of State - Duncan Hunter SecDef)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Perdogg

There are a couple of differences between the two cases in Jones v Bush, that suit would have at most prevented Cheney from serving as vice president. In addition the electors of Texas would be the ones guilty of breaking the law. The problem in this case is that if Obama is not president of the United States he cannot give orders to the military and as a result if a member of the military follows those orders he will be guilty of following an illegal order.


43 posted on 07/16/2009 9:56:59 AM PDT by ronnietherocket2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg
I cannot see any federal judge going against Jones V Bush.

Your link goes to the filing, not to the action of the court. The filing means zip, the order or other action of the court, means everything.

Besides, it a district court, whose precedent only holds in that district, IIRC. If higher courts declined to hear any appeals, that carries no weight of precedent either.

202 posted on 07/16/2009 8:41:24 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson