Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Question_Assumptions

I don’t think giving disadvantaged people a ‘nudge’ or even a hand up is bad either. What is bad is the federal government dictating and mandating(especially in private industry) that it be done and that it be done for only one or two groups of people baised on the color of their skin or their gender.

In fact, it is the ultimate form of rascism and bigotry to assume that because you are black or female, that you are somehow disavantaged on that basis alone. Notice too, that this mandate is not protecting minorities in general or else it would have just said ‘minorities’. It didn’t. It said blacks. What about hispanics, asians, indians or all of the other racial minorities in this country?

Women are not disadvantaged in this country nor are they a minority(I don’t think)...so why are they included for this special treatment under the law?

Equal Opportunity Under The Law should mean just that...EQUAL OPPORTUNITY...not special treatment.


103 posted on 07/15/2009 7:46:17 PM PDT by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]


To: penelopesire

If they are not getting a large number of any particular type of applicant, I don’t think it’s a problem to ask for more of them, so long as there isn’t punishment if they don’t get them.


104 posted on 07/15/2009 8:02:19 PM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson