Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Whites need not apply
City of North Little Rock, AR ^ | 15 JUL 09 | dcbryan1

Posted on 07/15/2009 7:56:58 AM PDT by DCBryan1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 next last
To: dmz

“You are looking at this in a profoundly superficial fashion. I suspect that the inner workings of a corporate HR department are somewhat of a mystery to you, as they are to many.”

I am looking at this from the perspective of someone cruising the help wanted section of any newspaper looking for a job. What this tells me(because of the specific wording) is that they are looking for black and female applicants only.

I am happy to grant you the point that HR departments are a total mystery to me and many others. However, it is still a total departure from our constitution, where all are equal under the law.

The federal government should not be dictating to states, cities or private companies who they are allowed to hire or fire. Furthermore, they should not be allowed to fine said entities for things that are beyond their control ie, how many minorities choose to apply for a job. The wording would not have bothered me one bit if it had said that minorities ‘were encouraged to apply’. This wording goes way beyond that and leaves the impression that the job is specifically open to only blacks and women.

Thanks again for your input.


61 posted on 07/15/2009 9:21:04 AM PDT by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: VastRWCon
Black? I thought they liked African American? Is them using the word black racist?

If a white person was born in Africa and emigrated to the U.S., wouldn't they be "African-American?"

62 posted on 07/15/2009 9:23:20 AM PDT by Disambiguator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire

I guess the goal ISN’T a colorblind society,
nor is it a “level playing field”.

The goal is a preference based, tilted playing field.
Forever.


63 posted on 07/15/2009 9:23:50 AM PDT by MrB (Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

bttt


64 posted on 07/15/2009 9:24:26 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

Go for it. The time has come for action.


65 posted on 07/15/2009 9:25:55 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Nemo me impune lacessit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

City of North Little Rock
City Services
120 Main Street
P.O. BOX 936
North Little Rock, AR 72115
Phone: (501) 975-8888


66 posted on 07/15/2009 9:26:02 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

Great comments here.
Until there is a valid legal definition of “black” “african-american” “hispanic” “white” “caucasian” and other nonsense there is no way any government agency or employer can say that an applicant is NOT a member of a specially-privileged “minority” group.
Since there is no definition, no law can be based on terms that have no definition.
The whole industry of race-based privileges is illegal and corrupt. It is nothing more than giving special privileges to certain people who return the favor by voting democrat.


67 posted on 07/15/2009 9:26:19 AM PDT by Leftism is Mentally Deranged (leftism is morally and ethically corrupt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire

IOW Sotomayor racism seal of approval.


68 posted on 07/15/2009 9:27:21 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: All

EMAIL THIS TO THE SENATE JUDICAL COMMITTEE AND ASK SOTOMAYOR TO COMMENT ON IT IN LIGHT OF BEING REVERSED!

(and email it ot rush, beck and the state media stooges)


69 posted on 07/15/2009 9:34:29 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: grjr21
I drink a lot of beer and have a significant amount of Black and Tan inside me.
70 posted on 07/15/2009 9:37:32 AM PDT by I Buried My Guns (Buy Lots Of Ammo Today: BLOAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire
Oh, it is wrong all right, just not for the reasons you might think. They are fulfilling a quota of applications and abiding by (a bad) state law.

That does not mean that the hiring is biased, necessarily

71 posted on 07/15/2009 9:40:40 AM PDT by Unassuaged (I have shocking data relevant to the conversation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: dmz
Like many government programs, folks working in those areas become expert at appearing to be in compliance while continuing business as usual.

You obviously haven't seen the make up of State & Federal employees lately. Black females are the number one employee of the government.

72 posted on 07/15/2009 9:41:19 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: MrB

I agree. This ad not only would appear to exclude white people.....it also appears to exclude hispanics, asians, native americans, and any number of other ethnicities.


73 posted on 07/15/2009 9:42:06 AM PDT by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

On questionaires that require giving my race, I always check the box labeled “other”, even though I’m Irish white. Well, actually I’m what is called Black Irish, so maybe I can check the negro box.


74 posted on 07/15/2009 9:47:19 AM PDT by Sig Sauer P220 (Forget going Galt. Its time to go Braveheart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

Does this mean black and female or black females.

Or does this mean black and female meaning blacks or females.


75 posted on 07/15/2009 9:52:19 AM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

Are they implying that women and minorities are only qualified to be maintenance workers! Kind of demeaning to both I would say.


76 posted on 07/15/2009 9:56:19 AM PDT by Always Independent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrannyAnn

But plenty of whites are stupid and lazy. Why can’t they claim minority status?

Perhaps more to the point, plenty of whites grow up in bad neighborhoods, with bad schools, absent fathers, and no family tradition of hard work and achievement. Why can’t they claim minority status?

And if they did make that claim, how would it be disproved?


77 posted on 07/15/2009 10:05:17 AM PDT by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire

I don’t see quite how you go from “As an equal opportunity employer, the City of Little Rock is seeking qualified black and female applicants” to the job being ‘specifically open to only blacks and women’.

Are you currently a job seeker? I’m guessing not (purely a guess) based on my own superficial reading of your comments. An active job seeker has seen so many of the affirmative action disclaimers that they become nearly invisible.

But instinctively, you do understand affirmative action. But kind of in reverse. Your comment that companies are not in control of who applies is part of what makes affirmative action affirmative. As in reaching out proactively to the groups that are under represented in your applicant pool. Taking specific steps to engage those that are under represented.

By way of example, let’s say I post job ads in only one of a town’s major newspapers, and it happens to be the one that has a largely white audience. An affirmative action program might have the organization also post the job ad in the paper that is primarily read by a minority audience as well, so as not to exclude them. In other words, the organization can attempt to control, or to increase the reach of its recruiting efforts.

Burdensome on the organization ... you betcha. But a lot cheaper than the fines and back pay companies routinely pay for NOT hiring the most qualified applicant.


78 posted on 07/15/2009 10:28:17 AM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire

This will not stand.


79 posted on 07/15/2009 10:31:43 AM PDT by gathersnomoss (General George Patton had it right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

Amongst (usually old-money) black “high society” the “paper bag test” is applied to women. Must be lighter than a brown paper bag, and your hair must be straight as a ruler.

Someone like Michelle Obama fails to qualify, and is considered “ghetto” by them.


80 posted on 07/15/2009 10:33:12 AM PDT by Boiling Pots (Barack Obama: The final turd George W. Bush laid on America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson