> 65 million idiots voted FOR him, the opposing party conceded, 300 million Americans tacitly watched his inauguration, the outgoing POTUS validated him and the Chief Justice of the USSC capped it off with a handshake,... he is POTUS.
The Rule of Law vs The Will of The People was the core issue between Bush and Gore. Rule of Law won.
Why should this situation be any different?
“> 65 million idiots voted FOR him, the opposing party conceded, 300 million Americans tacitly watched his inauguration, the outgoing POTUS validated him and the Chief Justice of the USSC capped it off with a handshake,... he is POTUS.
The Rule of Law vs The Will of The People was the core issue between Bush and Gore. Rule of Law won.
Why should this situation be any different?”
the Constitution trumps all that, if he is not a natural born citizen then everything he has signed since last January is null and void.
Of course that is just a dream, since every branch of government (except barely the Supreme Court) is owned by the Damocrats we are officially governed by tyranny.
William Jefferson Clinton was guilty of perjury and of suborning such. Rule Of Law did not win then.
Why should this be any different?
1996: 47,402,357 vs. 39,198,755 - Clinton beats Ken Starr by 8 million
2000: 50,456,002 vs. 50,999,897 - Rule of Law gets a token win
2008: 69,456,897 vs. 59,934,814 - Cult of Personality beats Rule of Law by 10 million
Probably about 6-7 million, I'd guess. That's where will of the people trumps rule of law, unfortunately.
Either way, by your own admission this is clearly now a judicial oligarchy, not a constitutional republic.
You're depending on one tiny branch to respect the Constitution when every other segment of the Republic has ignored it in this case: Electorate, Congress, outgoing POTUS, governors, state legislatures, generals, colonels, ambassadors, past presidents, etc, etc.