I’m not going to waste time finding what you can easily find yourself. Go to Creation.Com, click on “answers”, scroll down to Galileo, and it you will find that it is all there in black and white.
As for your imagination, it’s not lacking in the slighest because it is overactive in the extreme. There are no transitionals leading from one kind to another kind. That goes for every living kind, and every kind contained in the fossil record. There are NO TRANSITIONALS from one kind to another...but there should be, in the words of Darwin, “innumerable transitional forms...embedded in countless numbers in the crust of the earth...” But there is not one unanbiguous transitional leading from one kind to another that your fellow evo-religionists can point to, and yet their faith remains unshaken to this very day, after 150 years painstakingly looking form them.
“I’m not going to waste time finding what you can easily find yourself. Go to Creation.Com, click on “answers”, scroll down to Galileo, and it you will find that it is all there in black and white.”
—I went through every link there, and they gave no examples... no names, no quotes, nothing. The links were just parroting the claim that Galileo’s opponents were primarily from the “scientific establishment”. Yet I can find statement after statement after statement coming from the Vatican and theologians saying that Galileo is guilty of heresy for believing in heliocentricity which is contrary to Holy Scripture.
“There are NO TRANSITIONALS from one kind to another...but there should be...”
—There should be what exactly? As I said, I can’t fathom - even hypothetically - better examples than what we already have. What would be an “unambiguous transitional” from apes to man? Every time I ask this question of someone making this claim, I can never get an answer. If NOTHING, even hypothetically, could suffice, then it should hardly be surprising that after 150 years of looking that we haven’t found anything that suffices.