Fool me once, shame on me. Fool me twice, I'm a Freeper.
by HollywoodOz on Sat Mar 25, 2006 at 07:08:09 PM PDT
I don't think Chrissypoo read the entire thread. I was reading his article today and the note at the end of the article says:
NOTE: A screen capture of the entire thread has been saved here. Link at site)
Guess what. It is not the entire thread of 119 posts. It is the first 50. The same as any of us can pull out of a search engine.
2 possibilities.
He may have heard about it, pulled it up and was only able to get the first 50 in a cache. No wonder he was reticent to give names. He had none!~
What did he say? He had names-but it took the spark out of the story (or some nonsense) He's a damned fraud. Reporting on a thread he did not even read. LMAO
or
as anyone knows around here when a thread gets out of hand it is the first posts that are the worst. If he has the entire thread I'm wondering if he did not post it because the reaction of other freepers would ruin his entire story.
Which is it chrissypoo? All your head belongs to us!