[counterpunch]

Palin has a lot of critics on the right, and for a number of reasons.
The one thing the 3 you mention all have in common is a respect for the English language.

What you are doing here, of course, is promoting a logical fallacy — guilt by association — by attempting to discredit all Palin critics on the right by associating them with a few critics you dislike. Of course this is circular logic in the first place, because your reason for disliking them is primarily because of their criticism of Palin.

Perhaps you should start trying to defend Palin’s merits instead?

[Mojave]

Palin has a lot of critics on the rightUnnamed, naturally.

You and Andrew Sullivan don't count.

The one thing the 3 you mention all have in common is a respect for the English language.

Is that why they parrot Democrat talking points?

[Mojave]

What you are doing here, of course, is promoting a logical fallacy — guilt by association — by attempting to discredit all Palin critics on the right by associating them with a few critics you dislike.

Those were the exact parties named in the Losertarian article. Try reading more slowly.