Well, until I see something that is repeatable in terms of the parameters and measurements that some have documented thus far — I won’t consider it solved. I mean, I consider things as explained and solved, in the scientific realm, when an explanation is demonstrably repeatable. That’s what is needed and I haven’t seen anyone come up with it yet. And that’s what is going to be required for me.
—
I will mention, however, that not all things are repeatable, and yet, can have scientific principles applied to an explanation. So, I don’t mean to say or imply that if something cannot be repeated and shown to be done in a certain way, that it’s not true (historical events are such things). That’s not what I’m saying here. There are other things, which are one-time events, that are simply not repeatable, but can still have scientific principles applied to them.
But, this phenomenon of the crop circles is not one of those “non-repeatable” type of things. Thus, that’s why in order to have an explanation that works, it must fall completely into line with being repeatable and with all the parameters that one finds in any other crop circle (i.e., all measurements that can be taken and are recorded for others). Until that is done, it’s simply *not explained*....
The measurements regarding
1. microbursts of something akin to or equal to microwaves on the plant nodes
2. super dry soil
3. seeds sprouting faster
4. plants grown from such seeds being more drought resistent
5. plants grown from such seeds growing taller and more healthily
6. micro-fine iron particles dusting the frmation
7. magnetic anomolies
have all been REPEATEDLY SCIENTIFICALLY DOCUMENTED over a wide range of authentic crop formations.
And such have been written up in several peer reviewed scientific journals in the agricultural sciences.
Such are referenced and posted in the subscriber’s section of Linda Moulton Howe’s
website.