No I’m one of those people that supports the jury system in the united states. If they get it wrong appeal. But spin is spin, the DNA evidence was there.
Well, sir, you're just wrong. It's much more important to place our trust in sympathetic opinion pieces than in the unanimous judgment of 12 jurors who heard the evidence presented in the case.
Get with the program, man! We're a Tabloid Country now!
No it wasn’t. Who’s DNA was in her panties? Why was no DNA found on or inside her that matched the supposed perp?
You didn’t read the article did you?
There was no DNA evidence to suggest this guy had raped this female. Period.