Palin PING!
Anyone on or off the Palin ping, write me.
...
The left won't know what has hit them, once the backlash against their hate comes to fruition.
Wow! Even some on the Left finally get it.
Yeah, she’s down & almost out, so now it’s okay to say maybe you went a bit far. Eff them.
Palin PING!
Anyone on or off the Palin ping, write me.
...
The left won't know what has hit them, once the backlash against their hate comes to fruition.
The article below shows how serious they are about destroying Sarah. We must never forget that.
I Still Hate You, Sarah Palin
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NDE3MmE5MDVmMGM1YjQ2NmVhMjJkN2I2ZTcxMzhlNjU=
That’s a very nice well written commentary.
What are the responses looking like on HufPo?
i just cruised past a liberal feminist site (www.reclusiveleftist.com) where a post on the 4th of july was devoted to trying to figure out why feminists have such a rabid hatred for palin. the lady in charge over there seems genuinely confused as to why feminists are attacking another woman who is strong, accomplished, smart, and holds a position of power. many of the comments are in the same vein. why trash this woman and repeat lies that have been proven false or could be with a bit of research? why the vitriol? many of the commenters would not vote for palin due to political ideology, but they are giving her the benefit of the doubt and researching the facts. they are even poking some holes in oblabo over there. i find this interesting and share your opinion that some on the left are starting to wake up and smell the marxism, sexism, racism and anti-americanism.
This wording implies the "evil Republicans" attacked an "innocent Democrat." The truth is not nearly so simple.
The modern Republican Party has little or no connection to the "National Republican Party." It was rather a precursor of the Whig Party, which completely disintegrated in the years leading up to our big national shindig starting in 1861. While many Whigs, such as Lincoln, joined the Republican Party, it is in no real sense a descendant of the Whig Party.
Meanwhile, on the other side of the party nomenclature, the Democrats were known as no such thing in 1828. To the extent they had a party label, they were generally called Democrat-Republicans, viewing themselves as the heirs of the Jeffersonian Republican party more than anything else. There is a direct line of descent from the 1828 Democrat-Republican party to today's Democrat Party.
In actual fact, there were no real parties in today's sense in 1828. There were only pro-Jackson and anti-Jackson factions.
Finally, while Jackson may not have beaten up a man to steal his wife, he arguably did steal another man's wife, and he personally beat up and killed a good many men, and not necessarily during war. Making remarks about Rachel Jackson was an excellent way to wind up dead.
RE: 3rd party votes equal dim votes.
Not always.
Perot, ‘92 gave us the clintons.
Nader, ‘00 gave us w.
Sarahcuda scares the shit out of both sides so badly it’s really fun to watch. I went to a last minute called campaign stop for Sarah in Asheville, NC, (SF east), and she was sold out hours before I even got there. 25K seats in 18 hrs, now that’s impressive! Acorn and zero can’t compete with real Americans who are energized.
“Wow! Even some on the Left finally get it.”
Oh, heck no!
This is CYA. You don’t understand how they operate yet because you think like a mensch, a decent human being.
Palin is very very popular and her popularity is growing.
The left is starting to see a very big threat. Even Rove can’t get it on the right.
have you noticed more and more support for sarah and the questioning and criticizing of the attackers....something is happening...
have you noticed more and more support for sarah and the questioning and criticizing of the attackers....something is happening...
Actually, this is the 2nd or 3rd column from HuffPo writers that has been very supportive of Palin. I know, it’s a surprise. I suspect HuffPo has deliberately allowed some pro-Palin commentary to gin up the number of hits on their site. Since you can find anti-Palin stuff anywhere, the HuffPo was just one of a multitude of sources. Since pro-Palin commentary is less widespread, even conservatives will be drawn to the HuffPo. Just a thought.
Why? Because she is that GOOD ... She is a winner, and they are afraid of her. She is what this country has always been about. Family values, supporting the Constitution that formed the United States of America to become the most blessed nation ever. The liberals show no mercy, there is nothing to bad to say or attack. They do want to completely destroy her and there is no real hidden secret to expose.
So they make it up with accusations and back biting, harassment on going. Truth has nothing to do with it. They want to win, whatever It takes.
The part that puzzles me is there are republicans that agree with much the liberals accuse Sarah Palin having as shortcomings. God help us in our day ... in Jesus name I pray. amen.
This writer is right. The savaging Sarah and her family took hasexposed the left’s vile hate filled ways and turned the moderates away that they need to win elections.
Hey, how'd Maureen Dowd find her way into this article?