Would you really accept it as proof even if it were supplied? How much evidence would you need? One example, two, a million? Can you start with this very article as proof or do you have a scientific explanation for it?
The evidence is there if you are truly seeking it out and if you look at both the data and the data gathering techniques objectively.
Our current worldwide example of global warming can be used as an example of "scientific evidence" being influenced by outside factors. If so many scientists can get that wrong, and we are experiencing the data real-time, why can't the "scientific evidence" for evolution be called into question?
SOMETHING would be a good starting point, but e/s refuses to put anything up. How can he back up his assertions with nothing, and how can anyone refute it without seeing it? It's like some are already arguing the results of a race, and e/s won't even provide a starting point.
Let’s start with one. Show me ONE example of a 2000-year-old dinosaur.
Don’t toss global warming into the mix—I don’t believe in anthropogenic global warming anyway, and you are only bringing it up to muddy the waters.