1) Relative agility. Cows are more agile than, say, the Utahraptor....the 20 foot version of the velociraptor? OK.....since I cannot do any speed and agility trials with dinosaurs, I'll concede the point that cows are more agile than dinosaurs. What's that ACTUALLY mean to the point? Nothing. There would STILL BE millions of current land animals that would've died at the same time as the dinosaurs....in the same flood as the dinosaurs....and would've been potentially fossilized with the dinosaurs......yet we find no fossilized humans or land animals of the current sort in the fossil record.
2) Relative intelligence. As with agility, intelligence would not have brought them to any less of a demise than the dinosaurs. Did not the Global Flood kill ALL remaining animals? I don't think a cow has the intellect to avoid the Flooding waters any more than a dinosaur would....but we know that all land animals not on the Ark died in the Flood because the Bible says so in Genesis 7:21 (And all flesh died that moved upon the earth, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of beast, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth, and every man)........not ONE human fossil found....not ONE cattle fossil found.
3) Segregation of species. That's an interesting one.....but there is no reason to believe that ANY of the species self-segregated away from Man and ALL of the rest of the current land dwelling animals. Even better, large land-dwelling dinosaur fossils are found on ALL inhabited continents........even the Biblical places have dinosaur fossils......yet no Man or other current land animal fossils with them.....ANYWHERE.
4) Majority of fossil record is invertebrate. Ummmmm....we're not talking ancient mollusks and squid....or even vertebrate fish...of COURSE the majority of fossils are invertebrates, invertebrates have been around much longer and in higher numbers and in better conditions to fossilize....but we're talking land-dwelling dinosaurs that would've died during the Flood with the humans and other animals that were not on the Ark. This invertebrate fact is conceded but does not answer why no humans or other current animals were not fossilized with the dinosaurs killed by the Flood.
5) Bias toward one viewpoint. This is, of course, a problem in the science world.....particularly when politics get involved. BUT, do you really think that a fossilized human would be done away with through "bias"? The scientific find of the new millenium would be swept under the rug? That's one helluva dangerous world vision.
6) Censoring "inconvenient" data. That is ALSO a problem in the science world, especially when research funding is involved. BUT, do you really think that a fossilized human would be censored away? COULD be censored away?
So....what YEC must rely on in is unsubstantiated cheating and censorship? Even global warming alarmists are not able to censor the data. They twist, manipulate, and report their bogus conclusions on the data, but the data is still available in the raw unspun form for anyone to see.
You are free to believe any interpretation of the data you would like but to say there is no manipulation, censorship or bias in reading the data is testament to the level and depth of the manipulation, censorship and bias. Both sides, evolution and creation, have to interpret data with “just so” story telling to fill in the gaps because nobody was there to witness how that data came to be.
Could I be grossly incorrect? Of course I can, I'm only human. Could the evolutionary model be grossly incorrect? Of course it can, it was thought up by humans.