Her speech was filled with rambling sentences, run-on sentences, heavy breathing before she rambled onto the next few words, and on and on.
She is not in any way an accomplished speaker, although she is the opposite of Obambi. While he punctuates his speeches with "hmmmmms" and "ahhhhhs" while he's searching his pea-sized brain, Palin fills the void with a lot of fragmented nonsense.
This enthusiasm for Palin reminds me of the enthusiasm for Fred Thompson. Some of us here were found saying that Fred had no chance whatsoever...and the usual response was “RINO loser” and so on.
I also remember the chorus from 2006 and 2008 of “the polls don’t matter” and “the polls are always wrong”.
Maybe this will end differently and maybe Sarah will do much better than Fred. Maybe she will cause 2010 to be a 1994...heaven knows, we need someone to do that before the country is completely socialized. Maybe the person to lead that charge is Sarah. But for folks here to be so condescending and self-righteous in their condemnation of those of us who are skeptical (and therefore a bit worried about the unimpeded march of Obamaism), that seems to be unhelpful to the cause.
It is far from absolutely self-evident that Sarah is going to mop up the floor in 2010 with the MSM and all the Dems. It could happen...but it is far from obvious.