Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Economics Wasn't GM's Only Criteria For New Plant (Michigan chosen over Wisconsin, Tennessee)
Wall Street Journal ^ | July 6, 2009 | Neil King, Jr. and John D. Stoll

Posted on 07/05/2009 7:07:12 PM PDT by reaganaut1

When it was deciding where to build its new compact car, General Motors Corp. made a point of saying it would push politics aside and use strictly commercial criteria.

So Tennessee's three top officials were astonished last month, in a meeting with GM, when they were told the first two criteria were "community impact" and "carbon footprint" -- or how the choice would affect unemployment rates and carbon-dioxide emissions.

"Those didn't strike us as business criteria at all," said Tennessee Sen. Lamar Alexander, who was joined in the meeting by fellow Republican Sen. Bob Corker and the state's Democratic governor, Phil Bredesen. Those factors, Mr. Alexander said, "seemed odd for a company struggling to get back on its feet."

On June 26, after a monthlong competition, GM tapped an existing factory in Orion, Mich., pushing aside competing plants in Spring Hill, Tenn., and Janesville, Wis.

All the sites had merits, but the Michigan plant had additional attractions. It is embedded in a struggling state that is a Democratic stronghold. The Orion site, 35 miles from GM's Detroit headquarters, is also close to tens of thousands of current and former United Auto Workers union employees, whose pressure previously helped persuade GM to scrap plans to build the car overseas.

The area has one of the region's highest unemployment rates, at 12.4%, though the Wisconsin site's was even higher, at 12.9%. Janesville, by contrast, offered a less-expensive labor pool, according to people briefed on the plan. In Spring Hill, GM has a new, $225 million paint shop. The Orion plant's paint shop needs to be replaced.

Set to emerge from bankruptcy within weeks, GM declined to disclose the factors it weighed in picking Orion, but said the process was free of political meddling.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; US: Michigan; US: Tennessee; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: automakers; generalmotors; gm; governmentmotors
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last
States that dare to vote against Obama must be punished. Using government to "redistribute" wealth predates Obama, but that seems to be becoming its primary role.
1 posted on 07/05/2009 7:07:13 PM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: reaganaut1

It’s going to be a cold day at Algore’s house before I ever buy a GM or Chrysler product again.


3 posted on 07/05/2009 7:12:41 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Hey America! How's that "hope and change" thing working out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Yes. And just wait until they consolidate their power in the Banks/Insurance Companies, the health care Sector, Energy, etc. and you can see that we have barely begun the process of Gov’t intervention in our personal and financial lives.

Amazing to me that so few see the real implications of what is underway.

4 posted on 07/05/2009 7:14:55 PM PDT by TCats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

So find some way for the state to take the Spring Hill plant by emminent domain and sell it to someone who wants to make cars without the UAW and the federal government.


5 posted on 07/05/2009 7:18:36 PM PDT by hometoroost (Torture? Would you rather do 5 years at Gitmo or 5 hours with the Muslims?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TCats

If this kind of decision making is going to be the norm at the ‘new’ GM, I would advise the UAW to sell its shares ASAP.


6 posted on 07/05/2009 7:21:52 PM PDT by Wally_Kalbacken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Two words -
Jennifer
Granholm


7 posted on 07/05/2009 7:25:38 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wally_Kalbacken
If this kind of decision making is going to be the norm at the ‘new’ GM, I would advise the UAW to sell its shares ASAP.

The UAW will want GM to be owned by it and the government precisely so that it can keep more jobs in UAW strongholds like Michigan.

8 posted on 07/05/2009 7:26:42 PM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

...a policy which will actually cost the UAW jobs.


9 posted on 07/05/2009 7:29:26 PM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: screenombre; reaganaut1; Squantos
GM and Chrysler can GO TO HELL! Me and my family and my clan and my close friends have collectively and cooperatively vowed to never, EVER knowingly support them again.
10 posted on 07/05/2009 7:32:13 PM PDT by hiredhand (Understand the CRA and why we're facing economic collapse - see my about page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Good to see that GM has learned from its struggles. Wait, what?


11 posted on 07/05/2009 7:33:05 PM PDT by TXBlair (White-knuckling my way through the next three and a half years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: screenombre
I call on all Americans to NEVER buy a government motors car.

I'm with you on this.

I really like my Equanox, but it will be my last GM and UAW vehicle.

12 posted on 07/05/2009 7:35:29 PM PDT by cayuga (We lost the soapbox to MSM bias, and the ballot box to ACORN. The cartridge box is all we have left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

“said the process was free of political meddling”

Uh, yeah. Sure. What-ever.


13 posted on 07/05/2009 7:37:07 PM PDT by patton (Obama has replaced "Res Publica" with "Quod licet Jovi non licet bovi.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Quality Automobiles has nothing to do with it. They got their payoff and to hell with getting back in the quality automotive business.

Hopefully some serious automakers will move to them areas and take advantage of good craftsmanship and a solid work ethic.(try finding that in a Union shop)

14 posted on 07/05/2009 7:44:19 PM PDT by BallyBill (Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer
It’s going to be a cold day at Algore’s house before I ever buy a GM or Chrysler product again.

Does that include when Al runs the air conditioning at full blast, consuming a disproportionate amount of electricity?

Al Gore's Energy Use
Glass Houses

15 posted on 07/05/2009 7:54:34 PM PDT by justlurking (The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Obama told them to pick Michigan. End of story. Hard to do as WI Gov Doyle is like a tapeworm up Obama’s butt. Granholm is a prettier liberal face.


16 posted on 07/05/2009 7:57:38 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cayuga

Wouldn’t it be a strange turn of events if Conservatives shunned GM and Chrysler vehicles and only liberals bought the PC cars built by American legacy brands. Maybe then NBC would have to rig some foreign cars to explode with a pyrotechnic device. Previously I’ve bought Four Chevys, Two Buicks, a Dodge, and a Jeep, all used. It will be a major betrayal of allegiance to become a Ford or import guy. I hope some smaller innovative US alternative manufacturers spring up. What will I do with my “I’d rather push a Chevy than drive a Ford” T-shirt, and my “On a quiet night you can hear a Ford rust” front tag, or my “Heartbeat of America, Yesterday’s Chevelle” front tag?


17 posted on 07/05/2009 8:07:13 PM PDT by ME-262 (We need Term Limits for the federal house and senate. We need new Bums up there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Government Motors Corp is using POLITICAL assessments to make its decisions, not economic factors!


18 posted on 07/05/2009 8:12:10 PM PDT by 2harddrive (then)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
but said the process was free of political meddling.

Yeah, it wasn't a meddle, it was an outright directive.

19 posted on 07/05/2009 8:20:50 PM PDT by NonValueAdded ("I've conquered my goddam willpower." Don Marquis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

Same here, Amen.


20 posted on 07/05/2009 8:21:10 PM PDT by gakrak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson