These are the mechanics prior to the abomination of desolation.
The mark is being introduced under a litany of justifiable causes, but nowhere is the limitations of the mark being discussed.
When other technologies touching upon personal privacy are introduced, the same parties who advocate the mark also assert the technology’s impact on neurological functioning and thought processes is in the area of public domain an mass broadcasting.
Consider how any and every believer is saved. THey are saved through faith in Christ. Believing in Him and we are saved. After our initial thinking, if and when we fall out of fellowship by thinking anything other than through faith in Him, by thinking our confession of sin to Him through faith in Christ, we have forgiveness of sins by Him.
If Cell phones and Bluetooth are able to communicate in bidirectional modes, how would one anticipate a chip to communicate?
If it were to induce or intercept thinking patterns, would it not be the agenda of the Adversary to counterfeit God Himself by use of such a technology. If he were to counterfeit the mechanisms of God, might he not also attempt to prevent any believer from returning to fellowship with God through faith in Christ, by interrupting any and all confession of sin in our thinking to God through faith in Christ?
This is the mark of the beast, a mark which is used for commerce, without which one is not to sell or buy and from which, one might come and attempt to make an abomination of desolation, declaring himself to be God when he enters the Temple.
I had not considered the mark to be a communication
reciever and/or blocker. But you make an interesting
case. I know that soon we will not be able to buy
or sell wihout an imbedded chip of some kind.
The ac will have no problem separating the righteous
from the left us.