Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who's the Palin Leaker from the McCain Campaign?
National Review ^ | 2009-07-01 | Mark Hemingway

Posted on 07/01/2009 1:10:44 PM PDT by rabscuttle385

The publication of a Vanity Fair profile of Sarah Palin appears to have opened old wounds in the McCain campaign. At issue is a question that was never resolved following McCain’s loss in November: Who in the McCain campaign was secretly trashing Sarah Palin to the press?

(Excerpt) Read more at corner.nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: 2008; 2008veep; markwallace; mcbama; mccain; mccainantigop; mccainantipalin; mccainiacsantipalin; mccaintruthfile; mcqueeg; nicollewallace; palin; palinbashing; rino; rino5thcolumn; rinos4obama; romney; romneyantigop; romneyantipalin; waronsarah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-183 next last
To: Cedric
Too late---Steve Schmidt and David Wallace have been ID'd today.

You lost.

61 posted on 07/01/2009 2:45:57 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

No, they have not.

And you can’t even get the right Wallace.


62 posted on 07/01/2009 2:48:32 PM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: freekitty

That made me chuckle! I’m sure she had a hand in it.


63 posted on 07/01/2009 2:51:13 PM PDT by azishot (Please join the NRA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Moose4; Dan Middleton

The ‘cheesecake picture’ of her is from Runner’s World where she talks about her love of running and the love of sport that she has striven to inculcate in all her children, how it informs her character and the businesses she co-owns with her husband, etc..


64 posted on 07/01/2009 2:52:39 PM PDT by definitelynotaliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
If you're desperately grasping at the specious Kristol/Scheunemann “allegation”, here's what that's worth:

“Scheunemann had been fired, and, more specifically, he had been fired for leaking about the McCain campaign to Bill Kristol.”

I must confess, I'm just laughing at you now.

65 posted on 07/01/2009 2:56:44 PM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Cedric
Dude, how was the game with Tiger Woods?

Hey, that was classic, letting the little FR guys have a win to day with that whole source thing be revealed even though you kept saying it wouldn't be.

Being perfect is great isn't, especially when you are so perfect that you “allow’ lesser folks to “win one” just show the magnanimous nature of perfect people.

Kind of like when I let Tiger win in the scramble a couple of weeks ago. I knew he had been having a down season, so being perfect I can afford to be generous, after we guys like us do that, we can make it up real quick.

You did remind him about the ten spot, I mailed it today...

Haley said hi and be warned, the fillet was a bit tough last night...

66 posted on 07/01/2009 2:59:15 PM PDT by ejonesie22 (Mitt Romney is a more subtle version of Arlen Specter with better hair...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: definitelynotaliberal

We will find out soon enough Romney was behind the Where’s Gov Sanford? hunt that ended with Sanford having to admit to the an affair.

He’s an evil snake and is coming after everyone who stands in his way.


67 posted on 07/01/2009 3:00:16 PM PDT by RED SOUTH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: definitelynotaliberal

We will find out soon enough Romney was behind the Where’s Gov Sanford? hunt that ended with Sanford having to admit to the an affair.

He’s an evil snake and is coming after everyone who stands in his way.


68 posted on 07/01/2009 3:00:21 PM PDT by RED SOUTH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: definitelynotaliberal

We will find out soon enough Romney was behind the Where’s Gov Sanford? hunt that ended with Sanford having to admit to the an affair.

He’s an evil snake and is coming after everyone who stands in his way.


69 posted on 07/01/2009 3:00:23 PM PDT by RED SOUTH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

the biggest lie in the whole nro article is when the NYT reporter is asking a question of McCain’s campaign manager in an email and she says “sorry for the loss”/ Yeah, right.

I don’t see why all these McCain people are so hard on themselves. Once the economy fell apart in Spetember he had zero chance of winning. None. Maybe he loses 51-49 instead of 53-46 if everything goes perfectly but does that really matter?

If someone were to make an objective list of problems wit the campaign or reasons he lost, she isn’t even in the top 100 probably.

She was the only reason he was even competitive throughout the beginning of Spetember and remarkably was slightly ahead and poised to win right before the Lehman Bros meltdown commenced and the economy underwent the worst 7 weeks since the Great Depression, all in the runup to the election.

Are they hoping to preserve their reputation for a future campaign? I don’t think it was ruined in the first place. Look at David Axelrod, before Obama, he was the mastermind behind John Edward’s gloriously successful victory in the Democratic primary of 2004. Oh wait, that’s right, Edwards did nothing in that primary. Plouffe, the so-called wizard behind the scenes worked on Gephardt’s magnificently succesful primary. Again, a total washout. I don’t think anyone who matters would look askew at some of these guys because of their performance on the campaign. Campaigns are all about being in the right place at the right time. If the economy had collapsed in Sept, 2004, Keryy would have been the star and all his people geniuses. Instead, it’s Obama.

So, what’s the point? What happened, happened. the economy did collapse and that was impossible to overcome. Why continue to air dirty laundry? What good does it serve? Are they advertising themselves to potential future employers?

And why is this getting so much attention? A longtime NYT writer who now works at the equally liberal Vanity Fair(and who seems to have some unhealthy fixation on the Governor’s appearance) just came out with a hit piece on who they see as the biggest threat to Obama’s continued power. No surprise there.

Lots of people have reason to go after her. The dems because she’s a threat to them and other Republicans becasue she is as well. So they are serving notice that they will do everything to hound her and attack her at every opportunity to drive her from the scene. But I think most folks see through it. Will some be affected? Yes. But the types who read and are influenced by Vanity Fair don’t really vote Republican or conservative anyway. It’s preaching to the choir.

The liberal and elite media lives in this conceit that Katie Couric or SNL swung the election. That Palin was the key factor. Please. Voters cared way more about seeing their 401Ks and the market go down the tubes. They cared way more about seeing unemployment skyrocket under a GOP President. About an unpopular that 65% of them opposed and that the GOP nominee championed. About a President that 75% of them couldn’t stand. Imean there were 100+ issues that were more important than some goofy sketch on a late night tv show or a 5 minute interview. Do they really think voters are so stupid and shallow they decide who to vote for for President based on a 5 minute clip from TV?

But yeah, it probably came from a few at the top.


70 posted on 07/01/2009 3:01:23 PM PDT by jeltz25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RED SOUTH

OK, OK, OK.

Dunno why you addressed this to me, but I’m not sorry that loose, loverly lips is removed from any future in politics.


71 posted on 07/01/2009 3:02:58 PM PDT by definitelynotaliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22
Nothing has come to light except Kristol, feeling that he's about to be outed in this matter is now using an offense as a defense, employing the inestimable Randy Scheunemann.

“Whatever the permutations, the advisers said they strongly believed that Mr. Scheunemann was disclosing, as one put it, ‘a constant stream of poison’ to William Kristol, the editor of the conservative Weekly Standard and a columnist for The New York Times.

One lies, the other testifies to it: Whoopee.

72 posted on 07/01/2009 3:07:31 PM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Cedric

Wasn’t me-—I did some quick research and corrected the error.

No dice, kemosabe!


73 posted on 07/01/2009 3:07:35 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
The publication of a Vanity Fair profile of Sarah Palin...

One has to wonder if this week's rash of anti-Sarah propoganda has anything to do with her victory last weekend in the Kansas straw poll.

74 posted on 07/01/2009 3:11:45 PM PDT by rhinohunter (Want to REALLY see the left TOTALLY meltdown??? (Cheney - Palin '12))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
So far, we've got a New York Times columnist and his lying leaker making claims that the “high level McCain staffer” is the husband of a low-to-mid-level staffer.

You guys are beautiful.

75 posted on 07/01/2009 3:12:46 PM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Cedric
Wow, you really do love the little folk, I love that you keep ‘playing” with them.

You are a credit to all the perfect people...

There should be a statue erected...

76 posted on 07/01/2009 3:13:53 PM PDT by ejonesie22 (Mitt Romney is a more subtle version of Arlen Specter with better hair...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: rhinohunter

...or her visit to the Stennis and to Alaska troops in Kosovo.


77 posted on 07/01/2009 3:14:16 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Cedric

Uh...Nicole Wallace was Palin’s chief-of-staff and a senior campaign advisor to McCain, coming straight out of the Bush White House. That’s a little bit more than “mid-to-low” level.


78 posted on 07/01/2009 3:15:40 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22

Interesting you should bring that up:

I’m flying to Omaha tonight to discuss that very thing with Warren.


79 posted on 07/01/2009 3:16:03 PM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
Bumper sticker: Honk if you HAVEN'T been a Senior Campaign Adviser.

They give those titles out in lieu of pay (to low level twits).

80 posted on 07/01/2009 3:19:35 PM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-183 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson