Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: freedumb2003

Actually, since they were his legal kids arne’t they entitled to part of his estate even though they aren’t his biological kin?


50 posted on 06/28/2009 6:18:51 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Borges

“Actually, since they were his legal kids arne’t they entitled to part of his estate even though they aren’t his biological kin?”

What estate? I’m fairly sure he Owed more than he was worth. Explains why no one wants anything to do with the child molesting - drug addicted - Freak!


54 posted on 06/28/2009 6:26:32 PM PDT by clyde260 (Public Enemy #1: Network News!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: Borges

I thought he was in financial trouble. Who knows what his estate will be worth once the lawyers and of course the government get through with it. That said his estate will include ongoing rights to his recorded performances and that might get things righted in time. I recall Elvis Presley’s estate was in a shambles a few years after he died and it took Priscilla with no doubt some sharp financial guides to turn it into probably the biggest money making estate of deceased celebrities.


55 posted on 06/28/2009 6:30:21 PM PDT by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: Borges
Actually, since they were his legal kids aren't they entitled to part of his estate even though they aren’t his biological kin?

Yes, unless he left no provision for them in his Will.

84 posted on 06/28/2009 7:11:36 PM PDT by pray4liberty (http://www.aroodawakening.tv)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson