Not enough info for an answer. . .and most likely, intelligent as they are, they see someone trying to set a trap.
>Not enough info for an answer. . .and most likely, intelligent as they are, they see someone trying to set a trap.
That’s funny, cause I’m an enlisted under them.
Things like:
— the USSC’s 25Jun05 Kelo v New England [?] to allow theft and larceny under the guise of imminent domain.
— the USSC’s refusal to hear cases on Pr Obama’s eligibility.
— the USSC’s refusal to hear the cases of the GM/Chrysler bondholders; their bonds ARE backed by a legal document ans as such ARE enforceable under contract-law... the US Government OBVIOUSLY went around those policies.
— the Congress’s refusal to read, or even discuss the TARP bill.
— the Congress’s passing of the TARP bill in spite of massive constituent response in the negative.
— the Representative’s passing of the Cap And Trade bill in spite of massive constituent response in the negative.
— the Ex. branch’s refusal to operate in the promised transparent manner.
— Specifically: Rep. John Murtha; there is a good argument that his condemnation of the marines in time of war w/o trial; the demoralizing of troops by said action; and his position legitimizing the enemy’s use of fighting w/o uniforms (violation of the Hague conventions, IIRC) are obviously giving aid and comfort to the enemy.
— Pr Obama’s consistent appointments & nominations, in spite of his “most ethical admin.” comments, of people that are obviously corrupt. (Sec. of Treasury, Bill Richardson!...)
— The DHS’s leaked report on right-wing terrorism; yes it was retracted, but nothing significant ever came of it.
— The Obama Admin’s alleged heavy-handed tactics in dealing with the Execs of those car companies, of which Pr Obama was personally present and condoning.
— The was the banks were forced to take bailout monies.
So, my question is: how much trampling of the US Constitution is required before we are to defend it as we are sworn to do? (Just ONE amendment, the one guaranteeing equal protection of the law, is obviously being violated in some way by ALL of the listed points... there are more violations than just that, of course.)
Why did we let the USSC tell us that it’s ok for the government to take someone’s private property and then turn it over to another private entity? That means that someone with enough governmental pull could say “I want this guy’s land...” and poof you don’t have a home anymore. (Or any other private property which they might covet, like the resources secured by the backing legal document of bonds.)
Why do we let the Justice dept. sweep the allegations of massive multi-state voter-registration fraud dissipate into nothing?
We are already trapped, IMO. It is, in my opinion, time to fight back. Take treason, http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/usc_sec_18_00000241——000-.html & http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/usc_sec_18_00000242——000-.html all together and I think we citizens could make a case against HUGE portions of the government; all three of these laws have death as a possible punishment.