Posted on 06/28/2009 5:15:49 AM PDT by Kaslin
Obama said in his latest hem-hawing, foreign policy bloviating, what-the-hell-is-he-talkin’-about press conference that “we need to have a vigorous debate” regarding Iran’s current tyrannical Muslim-based governmental crushing of young people who desire a touch of freedom.
We need to debate? “We” who, BHO?
I’m guessin’ he is talking about American liberals and conservatives because—from what I can deduce from the YouTube vids—it appears as if the Iranian dissidents aren’t looking for lively banter with the death dealing, lying through coffee-stained teeth religious whack jobs who look like a group of angry, homeless Santa Clauses on crack.
A debate, Mr. O? Really?
FYI to the Whitehouse: Ayatollahs, mullahs, and Ahmadinejads don’t discuss stuff. They shoot you in the face. You don’t believe me? Well, then just ask Neda, a beautiful freedom-loving 26-year-old Iranian protester who lives in Tehran. What’s that? The Tehran terror cops, the Basij, shot her? See, I told you so. Uncut Islam doesn’t debate; it deals death to dissenters and, it seems, Mohammed is cool with that. Jesus isn’t okay with it, but Mohammed is.
Yes, El Presidente, you kind of need two intelligent parties that are able to chill in order to actually have a profitable discussion.
From what I’ve seen, historically speaking, a vigorous and beneficial chat is the perk that a Judeo-Christian based nation, which has an armed citizenry, gets to enjoy. Oppressive, mucked-up Muslim nations like Iran don’t argue about their bogus elections or dictates with intelligent, liberty-loving, non step-n-fetch rebels. As stated, they pistol whip them, split their skulls with a night stick, drag non-compliant co-eds around by their scalps, or simply pull out their guns and double tap the center mass of the unarmed non-compliants. God only knows what we’re going find out about the June 24th, 2009 massacre in Baharestan square. I heard they used axes and threw protestors off pedestrian bridges.
Ah . . . Islam in action. How peaceful. What an awesome religion.
Y’know, after watching the past two weeks of Ayatollahs Gone Wild, slamming their zealous fists on their podiums, spewing more propaganda than Robert Gibbs does during his weekly presser, and pummeling any and all dissenting voices, I’m sure many people around the world are lining up to become Muslims and move to a country governed by mullahs. It looks fun, doesn’t it? I mean, it’s a little bloody and oppressive and all, but hey . . . nobody is perfect.
From a PR standpoint, Iran is for Islam what Perez Hilton is for homosexuality.
And Barack wants to have a debate? A debate? Puh-lease.
It must be nice to live in la-la-land where trees are made of chocolate, where cigarettes fall from heaven, where you can print trillions of dollars and idiots approve it, where your administration can Pac Man the private sector, tax the crap out of our people, rob their health care, hard sell us bogus energy bills, while gutting the constitution—a place where you get to be the leader of the most powerful place on the planet simply because you can read a mean teleprompter.
I don’t believe the Iranians who’d like a free election (shame on them) want us to mediate a spicy round table spat. I think they desire a little more. I think they want us to meddle on a Guns & Ammo type level. Thus the protest signs in English. Kinda seems odd they’d go English with their placards if they didn’t want our attention and involvement.
I, for one, believe that we should meddle in such slave states. The “we” I believe that should intervene is the old America spelled with a “c” and not the new Amerika spelled with a “k”.
The reason I think it’s a good thing Obama and his admin stays the hell out of this Iranian throw down is two fold: If the young Iranians can topple their crap government, it’ll be a real morale boost, eh? I know it was for America’s founding fathers, God bless ‘em.
Secondly, if I were a Neda in Iran, I wouldn’t trust Obama as far as I could spit a loogie. Why? Well, it seems as if he has a soft spot for Muslim terrorists. Yep, this President is the same guy who, just before Iran’s election, sent the Ayatollah a good luck letter, is releasing 250 of the worst SOBs on the planet (the terrorists from Gitmo) to foreign countries (I hear the recidivist rate among terrorists is rather high), whose DOJ appointees want to prosecute CIA operatives who crack down on terrorists (hello), and who’s giving, I believe, over a billion dollars in aid via the UN to frickin’ Hamas. Yes, if I were a dissident I would tell BHO and his boys thanks, but no thanks.
Finally, mad to props to GWB for spawning hope for free elections in the heart of young Iranians as they watched their next-door neighbors enjoy real democracy in Iraq.
Oh . . . and one more thing. I don’t hear too many “moderate Muslims” condemning Iran’s murderous mullahs. Hmmm. That’s interesting. You’d figure they’d be on those mooks like stink on a monkey. But maybe they’re just too busy. Who knows?
“we need to have a vigorous debate”
He didn’t pay attention to what was occurring after the 1979 takeover by the Ayatollahs - he was being taught to be an “old African Colonialist” (I borrowed that term) and a socialists - he needs a debate to caught up and learn what’s going on in the rest of the world - while we in the US are going to have to pay for his “re-education” - and failures!
SEND HIM TO THE OFFICE!!!
"'The debate taking place in Iran is in reality a debate between Iran and the West,' said Miliband on the sidelines of a meeting of the NATO-Russia Council and Organization for Security and Co-operation, which is currently taking place on the Greek island of Corfu.
"He said sanctions were not an option that should be sought by the European Union.
"'The debate with Iran should continue ... we all have a clear position and that is for the Iranian people to choose their government and for the Iranian government to protect their own people against violence.' "
See Britain and Italy reluctant to impose new Iran sanctions http://www.monstersandcritics.com/news/middleeast/news/article_1486273.php/Britain_and_Italy_reluctant_to_impose_new_Iran_sanctions_
Euroweenies on display. And to demonstrate their firm commitment to peace and human rights, they all support Obama that firm pressure must be put on Israel to stop all construction within the settlements.
I would ask that both of you take the time to read over your sentences, and do a little spell/grammar checking, before you hit the POST button. It would help us all understand what you wrote.
Sigh. We could use a Reagan about now. I join the Iranian reporter in looking for a Reagan, just like Reagan came in and 'fixed' the effects of the Cartuh years. If anything, Obama is thinking about how to avoid such protests when he runs again.
They want him to be the second Reagan and tell the Mullas ‘Turn the wall down’ ...................................... Sounds like Satire. Obama has taken on more than he can handle. He is sooo over his head. Total lack of any leadership experience and they expect him to be anything other than “Present”?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.