Posted on 06/27/2009 10:34:36 PM PDT by pissant
You have not revealed that you are working for Obama.
But you have revealed that your goal is 100% consistent with the Obama-Ayers agenda.
Did I say he was "Happy"? The Mau Mau rebellion is central to the formation of who he is.
"Then we need to attack the agenda."
We ARE attacking his agenda on a daily basis. Anything & everything about him needs to be put on record to be unloaded like a tsunami when the time comes.
There is no fact that should be left uncovered, so that there will be no doubt about him, when the Amercian people finally wake up.
While Obama robs our liberty before our eyes do you honestly think the straw that will break the camels back of general opinion about him will be that Bill Ayers was his ghostwriter?
WTF are you talking about?
Again, your "obvious" is not working.
I cannot predict the future and do not know what will ultimately bring the usurper down, but I do KNOW not to give up, on anything.
Does common sense not tell you that if the "obvious" is not working, perhaps you should try the "not obvious"?
Anything & everything about him needs to be put on record to be unloaded like a tsunami when the time comes.
The time is NOW
Tinfoil theory doesn’t work for me
“If Bill Clinton taught us anything it should be this: There is no political gain to be gotten from laying bare the ugly truths behind leftist mythology.”
Well said. In this situation, as the pros have been telling us, there is no substitute for an electoral plurality. We all have ideas why that didn’t happen. Next time. But Cashill’s excruciating examination (now with ‘Mr. West’s assistance) is not without value, and is persuasive, though short of proof in a judicial sense. Convincing folks now, especially supporters of ‘the Won’, would require nothing short of a public confession. To me, what is significant here is how each word and phrase mentioned in the ‘two’ author’s writings is crafted to create or sell an impression rather than tell a cohesive story, in this case, about the supposed author. And this was done years ago, inclusive of a period in which a publisher, giving an advance to a thirty something unpublished author, asked for its refund when no manuscript was forthcoming. Someone other than Cashill wrote that Dreams included a reference to the author’s birth certificate, a seemingly strange reference in context unless it was also inserted to create an impression. The pattern of intent here is certainly wedded to this author’s history over a period of almost thirty years, and is probably more significant.
Have you lost your mind?
Well let’s just ignore the obvious destruction of the constitution then and pursue this course of action.
“Bill Ayers penning words for Obama has all the impact of a wet noodle”
You’re partly right, but for a reason you’re not aware of—wet noodles stick.
Ghostwritergate can stick to Obama better than anything else. It’s simple and user friendly. Easy to understand, not a complex scheme involving uncertain events or complicated historical documents.
Obama couldn’t write his own book so he got a terrorist to write it for him, then he lied about it so he could get elected.
Well, you have certainly wasted a lot of time and effort on something that "doesn't work for you."
Yes, words have meaning, but actions speak a heck of a lot louder, as yours has.
Nope, but I think some here have.
Anything & everything about him needs to be put on record to be unloaded like a tsunami when the time comes. "The time is NOW"
Hey, man, you're preaching to the choir!! Get the rest of America onboard & then we can talk about some realistic progress.
What do you have in mind about doing that??
So you admit it's tinfoil theory?
Um, no. See those quotes? That means I was quoting you, using your words.
I’d give you a B for effort, but that was pretty lame.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.