Victor Davis Hanson is right on every point in the article - but he's missing the fact that Obama comes from a tradition of thuggery - from ACORN to Alinsky.
How can Obama come out against strong men stealing an election when his own "team" winks and nods at ACORN?
The best Obama could muster at the beginning was "ImANutJob" thugs shouldn't be killing their own citizens.
Obama feels the Mullahs should do "thuggy soft" - set up an Iranian version of Janet Napolitano - stick her on the citizens to make them all look like criminals. Maybe hire some low level thugs to write fake letters to the editor to make it look like everyone objects to the protesters. Or better - contact some shills in the Iranian state run media ( their version of our MSM) and hold up the opposition to mockery.
So the Dem's problem with people objecting to crooked elections - is that Dems are on the side of the Mullahs...they vote the dead - laugh about cheating as if it's "just a game" and "everyone does it". But in fact, it's the corrupt who "do it". Iranian corruption or Chicago corruption. Stealing a "supreme leader" spot - or a presidency for Kennedy. Same thuggery.
No wonder Obama doesn't "get it".
bttt