LucyT wrote:
“”So, then, -—IF-— she wasn’t 0’s mom
why did her passport records for 1965 & earlier get scrubbed??”
Her passport records were scrubbed because the child known as Barack Hussein Obama was not on her passport.”
The passport application that —is—available shows “Barack Hussein Obama (Soebarkah)” in the “Add name (Remove name) of child” field, then the entire thing is lined out.
This was for a renewal of a passport that was —still good— it was issued in 1965 & good till 1970.
This shows that in 1968 the renewal was for the reason that she was adding “BHO” and removing “Soebarkah”, then for some reason, lined the whole thing out.
Was it because she couldn’t —legally— prove the kid was hers, because no Certificate of Birth to US Citizen Abroad could be found?
She was too young to convey citizenship.
The app is dated Aug 1968 (form issued Jul 1964).
Reason for her indefinite stay abroad was “married to an Indonesian citizen”.
Did she get an Indonesia passport for 0, due to her marriage to Lolo, and 0 used that to travel?
That would’ve worked when she was married to Lolo, but what about —before— then?
Was 0 really adopted by Lolo —in Indonesia— —before— Lolo married SADO?
And had an Indonesia passport all along?
See 3rd & 4th pages in scrollable documents here:
http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2010/07/strunk-foia-results-for-obamas-mother/
If 0 —wasn’t— on her passport- at a time when minor children travelled on adults passports- the question then is, on whose passport —did— he travel ? Indonesia?
He would’ve been 7 years old; children that young didn’t travel by themselves; they had to be escorted/sit with the stewardess and be met at the airport by someone.
So who met him & brought him?
Even if he may have had an Indonesia passport.
PAGE ONE
PAGE TWO:
AMEND TO INCLUDE (EXCLUDE) CHILDREN
Barack Hussein Obama (Soebarkah)
PAGE ONE NOTE:
...if any of the above named acts or conditions have been performed by or apply to the applicant, or to any person included in the passport or documentation, the portion which applies should be struck out, and a supplementary explanatory statement under oath ( or affirmation) by the person to whom the portion is applicable should be attached and made part of this application...
Dated and signed August 13th, 1968.
YOU WOULD NEED TO SEE THE SUPPLEMENTARY STATEMENT.
I have not, (and no other person to be included or to be included in the documentation has since acquiring United States Citizenship has,) etc etc etc...
INCLUDED OR TO BE INCLUDED?