No Willard is not a socialist, he used to be more liberal then he is now. If you want to get technical about it, Palin is a socialist too for spouting feminist views from time to time when she needs a cover for her actions. She would be one too for taxing the oil companies and giving it to the people as a redistribution check. I would never call Palin a socialist, but maybe I should since you don’t mind calling Willard one. It’s not right to be throwing around that term so loosly, it is a very serious term. I think it is wrong what you do, calling names to make a point. I think it is better to give an explaination and let people come to their own conclusions. I am very disappointed about Standford, because I sure am not thrilled about Palin getting the nomination, that’s for sure. In my book she is a big time manipulator. That’s not good for a female. We are supposed to rise above those games that females play, especially if we want to be President, because it isn’t Margret Thatcher type behavior.
Yup, Willard is a Socialist. Because Conservatives don’t shove bankrupting Socialist medicine down the throats of their respective states that they lead. Conservatives also don’t appoint pro-criminal jurists to the bench (willfully and knowingly). Conservatives also don’t gleefully sabotage the GOP for which they pledged to save. And I’ve got more where that came from. The man’s a phony and a fraud, and thoroughly despicable. Even with the damaged Sanford, if he resigned tomorrow, he would’ve accomplished on his own a record of standing up for Constitutional Conservatism and party growth for which Slick Willard wouldn’t be able to accomplish if he lived to be 200.
And if you want to go ahead and call Palin a Socialist, you go right ahead, because it will only prove that you Slick Willardbots harbor deep pathological hatreds for anyone who stand in between him and the Presidency.
Great. I don’t check the news today (return trip from Nashville to central Virginia), and look what happens.