[fieldmarshaldj]

I have defended the man to the hilt from a lot of people that aren’t Conservatives, and there was a contingent of RINOs on FR that would often bash him on policy. I stated again that I did not like, indeed, I abhorred, a rush to judgment on this before we knew the facts. It was a lynch mob mentality, and I won’t apologize for that. You want to call him names and bash him NOW over his admittance of guilt, that’s up to you. I wanted the man to be able to answer the allegations before passing judgment. If you think that is somehow wrong or misguided, what can I say ? I thought being a Conservative means giving a person the benefit of the doubt until such time as we know the facts, especially someone who has done much for our cause.

[jennyjenny]

If you wanted to defend the man, that's your choice. I have no problem with that. What I have a problem with is the way you've treated fellow freepers, me included, under the guise of defending him.

[Ditter]

Too bad it turned out this way. Now the MSM won't have to make something out of nothing. It is his private life as far as I am concerned. It wasn't clinton’s sex life that I held against him and I am not holding Sanfords sex life against him, I would if I was his wife, but I'm not his wife. A democrat could come back from this but a Republican, NEVER!